Kenya vs OECD members: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current)

Kenya
103.47 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
OECD members
3.07 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Kenya rank
44th
OECD members rank
42nd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) over time

  • Kenya
  • OECD members
0100200300400196119922023

How they compare

Kenya currently reports 103.47 current US$ per square kilometre against 3.07 current US$ per square kilometre in OECD members, a difference of 100.4 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Kenya's figure about 33.7 times OECD members's.

Across all 53 years both countries report, Kenya has been ahead every year.

Kenya ranks 44th and OECD members ranks 42nd of 168 countries.

Kenya has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kenya OECD members Difference Ahead
1970s 44.84 current US$ per square kilometre 0.1962 current US$ per square kilometre 44.64 current US$ per square kilometre Kenya
1980s 82.76 current US$ per square kilometre 0.5402 current US$ per square kilometre 82.22 current US$ per square kilometre Kenya
1990s 87.66 current US$ per square kilometre 1.83 current US$ per square kilometre 85.83 current US$ per square kilometre Kenya
2000s 146.85 current US$ per square kilometre 0.3003 current US$ per square kilometre 146.55 current US$ per square kilometre Kenya
2010s 318.4 current US$ per square kilometre 2.85 current US$ per square kilometre 315.55 current US$ per square kilometre Kenya
2020s 156.29 current US$ per square kilometre 4.28 current US$ per square kilometre 152.01 current US$ per square kilometre Kenya

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current), Kenya or OECD members?
Kenya, at 103.47 current US$ per square kilometre against 3.07 current US$ per square kilometre in OECD members as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) between Kenya and OECD members?
100.4 current US$ per square kilometre, with Kenya ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and OECD members?
53 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2022.
How do Kenya and OECD members rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current)?
Kenya ranks 44th and OECD members ranks 42nd of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kenya vs OECD members: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-kingdom-current-us-per-square-kilometre/kenya/oecd-members/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-kingdom-current-us-per-square-kilometre/kenya/oecd-members/">Kenya vs OECD members: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 9,882 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.