Malawi vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current)

Malawi
424.57 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Turks and Caicos Islands
505.26 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2007
Malawi rank
20th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
18th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) over time

  • Malawi
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
05.0k10.0k15.0k196119922023

How they compare

Turks and Caicos Islands currently reports 505.26 current US$ per square kilometre against 424.57 current US$ per square kilometre in Malawi, a difference of 80.69 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Turks and Caicos Islands's figure about 1.2 times Malawi's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1974 it was Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.

Malawi ranks 20th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 18th of 168 countries.

Turks and Caicos Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malawi Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
1970s 233.33 current US$ per square kilometre 3,074 current US$ per square kilometre 2,840 current US$ per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands
1980s 277.63 current US$ per square kilometre 7,252 current US$ per square kilometre 6,974 current US$ per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands
1990s 542.24 current US$ per square kilometre 9,180 current US$ per square kilometre 8,638 current US$ per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands
2000s 1,118 current US$ per square kilometre 2,307 current US$ per square kilometre 1,188 current US$ per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current), Malawi or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Turks and Caicos Islands, at 505.26 current US$ per square kilometre against 424.57 current US$ per square kilometre in Malawi as of 2007.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) between Malawi and Turks and Caicos Islands?
80.69 current US$ per square kilometre, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Turks and Caicos Islands?
34 years are reported by both, from 1974 to 2007.
How do Malawi and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current)?
Malawi ranks 20th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 18th of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malawi vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-kingdom-current-us-per-square-kilometre/malawi/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-kingdom-current-us-per-square-kilometre/malawi/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Malawi vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 9,882 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.