Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) vs Rwanda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current)
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) over time
- Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income)
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 919.98 current US$ per square kilometre against 70.43 current US$ per square kilometre in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income), a difference of 849.55 current US$ per square kilometre.
That makes Rwanda's figure about 13.1 times Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income)'s.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) ahead.
Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) ranks 10th and Rwanda ranks 10th of 45 groups.
Across the 7 decades both report, Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) averaged higher in 2 and Rwanda in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2.39 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.608 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.78 current US$ per square kilometre | Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) |
| 1970s | 4.33 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.52 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.81 current US$ per square kilometre | Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) |
| 1980s | 6.5 current US$ per square kilometre | 8.33 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.83 current US$ per square kilometre | Rwanda |
| 1990s | 10.18 current US$ per square kilometre | 642.48 current US$ per square kilometre | 632.3 current US$ per square kilometre | Rwanda |
| 2000s | 67.88 current US$ per square kilometre | 2,858 current US$ per square kilometre | 2,790 current US$ per square kilometre | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 166.06 current US$ per square kilometre | 4,068 current US$ per square kilometre | 3,902 current US$ per square kilometre | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 107.14 current US$ per square kilometre | 1,588 current US$ per square kilometre | 1,481 current US$ per square kilometre | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current), Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 919.98 current US$ per square kilometre against 70.43 current US$ per square kilometre in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) between Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) and Rwanda?
- 849.55 current US$ per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) and Rwanda?
- 55 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.
- How do Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) and Rwanda rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current)?
- Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (excluding high income) ranks 10th and Rwanda ranks 10th of 45 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.