OECD members vs South Sudan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current)

OECD members
3.07 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
South Sudan
108.62 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
OECD members rank
42nd
South Sudan rank
43rd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) over time

  • OECD members
  • South Sudan
0200400600197019962023

How they compare

South Sudan currently reports 108.62 current US$ per square kilometre against 3.07 current US$ per square kilometre in OECD members, a difference of 105.55 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes South Sudan's figure about 35.3 times OECD members's.

Across all 11 years both countries report, South Sudan has been ahead every year.

OECD members ranks 42nd and South Sudan ranks 43rd of 45 groups.

South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade OECD members South Sudan Difference Ahead
2010s 3.44 current US$ per square kilometre 371.57 current US$ per square kilometre 368.13 current US$ per square kilometre South Sudan
2020s 4.28 current US$ per square kilometre 224.65 current US$ per square kilometre 220.37 current US$ per square kilometre South Sudan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current), OECD members or South Sudan?
South Sudan, at 108.62 current US$ per square kilometre against 3.07 current US$ per square kilometre in OECD members as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) between OECD members and South Sudan?
105.55 current US$ per square kilometre, with South Sudan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for OECD members and South Sudan?
11 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2022.
How do OECD members and South Sudan rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current)?
OECD members ranks 42nd and South Sudan ranks 43rd of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

OECD members vs South Sudan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-kingdom-current-us-per-square-kilometre/oecd-members/south-sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-kingdom-current-us-per-square-kilometre/oecd-members/south-sudan/">OECD members vs South Sudan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 9,882 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.