Afghanistan vs South Sudan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current)
Afghanistan
0.0083 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2023
South Sudan
0.0265 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2015
Afghanistan rank
4th
South Sudan rank
1st
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) over time
- Afghanistan
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 0.0265 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0083 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Afghanistan, a difference of 0.0182 current US$ per US$ of GDP.
That makes South Sudan's figure about 3.2 times Afghanistan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Afghanistan ahead.
Afghanistan ranks 4th and South Sudan ranks 1st of 165 countries.
Afghanistan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current), Afghanistan or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 0.0265 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0083 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Afghanistan as of 2015.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) between Afghanistan and South Sudan?
- 0.0182 current US$ per US$ of GDP, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and South Sudan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2015.
- How do Afghanistan and South Sudan rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current)?
- Afghanistan ranks 4th and South Sudan ranks 1st of 165 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.