Eritrea vs Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current)

Eritrea
0.0041 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2011
Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)
0.0005 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2022
Eritrea rank
8th
Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) rank
11th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current) over time

  • Eritrea
  • Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)
00.0050.010.015197019962022

How they compare

Eritrea currently reports 0.0041 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0005 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries), a difference of 0.0036 current US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Eritrea's figure about 8.7 times Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)'s.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 19 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Eritrea ahead.

Eritrea ranks 8th and Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 11th of 165 countries.

Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eritrea Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0056 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0014 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0043 current US$ per US$ of GDP Eritrea
2000s 0.0039 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0028 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0011 current US$ per US$ of GDP Eritrea
2010s 0.0038 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0018 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0019 current US$ per US$ of GDP Eritrea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current), Eritrea or Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)?
Eritrea, at 0.0041 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0005 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) as of 2011.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current) between Eritrea and Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)?
0.0036 current US$ per US$ of GDP, with Eritrea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)?
19 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2011.
How do Eritrea and Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom (current)?
Eritrea ranks 8th and Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 11th of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eritrea vs Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-kingdom-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/eritrea/sub-saharan-africa-ida-and-ibrd-countries/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-kingdom-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/eritrea/sub-saharan-africa-ida-and-ibrd-countries/">Eritrea vs Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
current US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
212 places, 9,500 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.