Botswana vs Uruguay: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom

Botswana
383,188 current US$
in 2023
Uruguay
390,659 current US$
in 2017
Botswana rank
103rd
Uruguay rank
102nd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom over time

  • Botswana
  • Uruguay
05.0M10.0M15.0M20.0M196019912023

How they compare

Uruguay currently reports 390,659 current US$ against 383,188 current US$ in Botswana, a difference of 7,471 current US$.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 49 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Botswana ahead.

Botswana ranks 103rd and Uruguay ranks 102nd of 169 countries.

Botswana has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Uruguay Difference Ahead
1960s 10.91 million current US$ 21,667 current US$ 10.89 million current US$ Botswana
1970s 8.92 million current US$ 55,000 current US$ 8.87 million current US$ Botswana
1980s 12.06 million current US$ 31,000 current US$ 12.03 million current US$ Botswana
1990s 7.75 million current US$ 339,000 current US$ 7.41 million current US$ Botswana
2000s 1.65 million current US$ 110,000 current US$ 1.54 million current US$ Botswana
2010s 1.12 million current US$ 621,867 current US$ 496,035 current US$ Botswana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom, Botswana or Uruguay?
Uruguay, at 390,659 current US$ against 383,188 current US$ in Botswana as of 2017.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom between Botswana and Uruguay?
7,471 current US$, with Uruguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Uruguay?
49 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2017.
How do Botswana and Uruguay rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united kingdom?
Botswana ranks 103rd and Uruguay ranks 102nd of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Uruguay: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom. Statizoid, drawing on Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-kingdom-current-us/botswana/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-kingdom-current-us/botswana/uruguay/">Botswana vs Uruguay: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
216 places, 10,063 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors are the net disbursements of official development assistance (ODA) or official aid from the members of the Development Assistance Committee (DAC). Net disbursements are gross disbursements of grants and loans minus repayments of principal on earlier loans. ODA consists of loans made on concessional terms (with a grant element of at least 25 percent, calculated at a rate of discount of 10 percent) and grants made to promote economic development and welfare in countries and territories in the DAC list of ODA recipients. Official aid refers to aid flows from official donors to countries and territories in part II of the DAC list of recipients: more advanced countries of Central and Eastern Europe, the countries of the former Soviet Union, and certain advanced developing countries and territories. Official aid is provided under terms and conditions similar to those for ODA. Part II of the DAC List was abolished in 2005. The collection of data on official aid and other resource flows to Part II countries ended with 2004 data. DAC members are Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States, and European Union Institutions. Regional aggregates include data for economies not specified elsewhere. World and income group totals include aid not allocated by country or region. Data are in current U.S. dollars.