East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Latvia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$)

East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
2.3 % change on previous year
in 2022
Latvia
91.03 % change on previous year
in 2004
East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) rank
24th
Latvia rank
21st

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) over time

  • East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
  • Latvia
-1000100200300197119962022

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 91.03 % change on previous year against 2.3 % change on previous year in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries), a difference of 88.73 % change on previous year.

That makes Latvia's figure about 39.6 times East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)'s.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 12 shared years of data; in 1993 it was East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) ahead.

East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 24th and Latvia ranks 21st of 43 groups.

Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) Latvia Difference Ahead
1990s 16.35 % change on previous year 41.62 % change on previous year 25.27 % change on previous year Latvia
2000s -0.7203 % change on previous year 19.26 % change on previous year 19.98 % change on previous year Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$), East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) or Latvia?
Latvia, at 91.03 % change on previous year against 2.3 % change on previous year in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) as of 2004.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) between East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) and Latvia?
88.73 % change on previous year, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) and Latvia?
12 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2004.
How do East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) and Latvia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$)?
East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 24th and Latvia ranks 21st of 43 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Latvia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-states-current-us-annual-growth-rate/east-asia-and-pacific-ida-and-ibrd-countries/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-states-current-us-annual-growth-rate/east-asia-and-pacific-ida-and-ibrd-countries/latvia/">East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Latvia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 9,085 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.