Europe & Central Asia vs Grenada: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$)

Europe & Central Asia
30.54 % change on previous year
in 2023
Grenada
278.79 % change on previous year
in 2019
Europe & Central Asia rank
4th
Grenada rank
7th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) over time

  • Europe & Central Asia
  • Grenada
-25002505007501.0k196119922023

How they compare

Grenada currently reports 278.79 % change on previous year against 30.54 % change on previous year in Europe & Central Asia, a difference of 248.25 % change on previous year.

That makes Grenada's figure about 9.1 times Europe & Central Asia's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 17 shared years of data; in 1985 it was Grenada ahead.

Europe & Central Asia ranks 4th and Grenada ranks 7th of 43 groups.

Across the 4 decades both report, Europe & Central Asia averaged higher in 2 and Grenada in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Europe & Central Asia Grenada Difference Ahead
1980s -55.97 % change on previous year -35.63 % change on previous year 20.34 % change on previous year Grenada
1990s 52.92 % change on previous year -21.43 % change on previous year 74.35 % change on previous year Europe & Central Asia
2000s 18.87 % change on previous year -18 % change on previous year 36.87 % change on previous year Europe & Central Asia
2010s -7.23 % change on previous year 39.85 % change on previous year 47.08 % change on previous year Grenada

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$), Europe & Central Asia or Grenada?
Grenada, at 278.79 % change on previous year against 30.54 % change on previous year in Europe & Central Asia as of 2019.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) between Europe & Central Asia and Grenada?
248.25 % change on previous year, with Grenada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Europe & Central Asia and Grenada?
17 years are reported by both, from 1985 to 2019.
How do Europe & Central Asia and Grenada rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$)?
Europe & Central Asia ranks 4th and Grenada ranks 7th of 43 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Europe & Central Asia vs Grenada: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-states-current-us-annual-growth-rate/europe-and-central-asia/grenada/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-states-current-us-annual-growth-rate/europe-and-central-asia/grenada/">Europe & Central Asia vs Grenada: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 9,085 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.