Barbados vs Saudi Arabia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$)
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) over time
- Barbados
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Saudi Arabia currently reports 150,000 current US$ against 110,000 current US$ in Barbados, a difference of 40,000 current US$.
That makes Saudi Arabia's figure about 1.4 times Barbados's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 1966 it was Barbados ahead.
Barbados ranks 148th and Saudi Arabia ranks 145th of 164 countries.
Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 56,667 current US$ | 36,667 current US$ | 20,000 current US$ | Barbados |
| 2000s | 1.21 million current US$ | 292,000 current US$ | 914,000 current US$ | Barbados |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$), Barbados or Saudi Arabia?
- Saudi Arabia, at 150,000 current US$ against 110,000 current US$ in Barbados as of 2007.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) between Barbados and Saudi Arabia?
- 40,000 current US$, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Saudi Arabia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 1966 to 2007.
- How do Barbados and Saudi Arabia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$)?
- Barbados ranks 148th and Saudi Arabia ranks 145th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) with 200 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.