Cape Verde vs Latvia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$)
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) over time
- Cape Verde
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 2.77 million current US$ against 2.08 million current US$ in Cape Verde, a difference of 692,780 current US$.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.3 times Cape Verde's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 13 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.
Cape Verde ranks 127th and Latvia ranks 125th of 164 countries.
Cape Verde has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cape Verde | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 5.41 million current US$ | 4.99 million current US$ | 418,750 current US$ | Cape Verde |
| 2000s | 4.91 million current US$ | 1.58 million current US$ | 3.33 million current US$ | Cape Verde |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$), Cape Verde or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 2.77 million current US$ against 2.08 million current US$ in Cape Verde as of 2004.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) between Cape Verde and Latvia?
- 692,780 current US$, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Latvia?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2004.
- How do Cape Verde and Latvia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$)?
- Cape Verde ranks 127th and Latvia ranks 125th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) with 200 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.