China vs Congo: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$)

China
10.18 million current US$
in 2023
Congo
13.43 million current US$
in 2023
China rank
106th
Congo rank
104th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) over time

  • China
  • Congo
020.0M40.0M60.0M80.0M196319932023

How they compare

Congo currently reports 13.43 million current US$ against 10.18 million current US$ in China, a difference of 3.25 million current US$.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.3 times China's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1998 it was China ahead.

China ranks 106th and Congo ranks 104th of 164 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, China averaged higher in 3 and Congo in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Congo Difference Ahead
1990s 19.32 million current US$ 345,000 current US$ 18.98 million current US$ China
2000s 27.15 million current US$ 6.83 million current US$ 20.32 million current US$ China
2010s 44.35 million current US$ 7.90 million current US$ 36.45 million current US$ China
2020s 13.33 million current US$ 15.54 million current US$ 2.21 million current US$ Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$), China or Congo?
Congo, at 13.43 million current US$ against 10.18 million current US$ in China as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) between China and Congo?
3.25 million current US$, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Congo?
26 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2023.
How do China and Congo rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$)?
China ranks 106th and Congo ranks 104th of 164 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Congo: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-states-current-us-gaps-filled/china/congo-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-states-current-us-gaps-filled/china/congo-rep/">China vs Congo: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
211 places, 9,809 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) with 200 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.