Czechia vs Kiribati: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$)
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) over time
- Czechia
- Kiribati
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 660,000 current US$ against 341,505 current US$ in Kiribati, a difference of 318,495 current US$.
That makes Czechia's figure about 1.9 times Kiribati's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Kiribati ahead.
Czechia ranks 138th and Kiribati ranks 140th of 164 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Czechia averaged higher in 1 and Kiribati in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 230,000 current US$ | 620,000 current US$ | 390,000 current US$ | Kiribati |
| 2000s | 1.14 million current US$ | 892,000 current US$ | 247,000 current US$ | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$), Czechia or Kiribati?
- Czechia, at 660,000 current US$ against 341,505 current US$ in Kiribati as of 2004.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) between Czechia and Kiribati?
- 318,495 current US$, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Kiribati?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2004.
- How do Czechia and Kiribati rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$)?
- Czechia ranks 138th and Kiribati ranks 140th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) with 200 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.