Early-demographic dividend vs Malawi: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$)

Early-demographic dividend
8.33 billion current US$
in 2022
Malawi
431.21 million current US$
in 2023
Early-demographic dividend rank
20th
Malawi rank
22nd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) over time

  • Early-demographic dividend
  • Malawi
02.0B4.0B6.0B8.0B10.0B196419932023

How they compare

Early-demographic dividend currently reports 8.33 billion current US$ against 431.21 million current US$ in Malawi, a difference of 7.90 billion current US$.

That makes Early-demographic dividend's figure about 19.3 times Malawi's.

Across all 53 years both countries report, Early-demographic dividend has been ahead every year.

Early-demographic dividend ranks 20th and Malawi ranks 22nd of 44 groups.

Early-demographic dividend has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Early-demographic dividend Malawi Difference Ahead
1970s 1.63 billion current US$ 3.85 million current US$ 1.63 billion current US$ Early-demographic dividend
1980s 3.92 billion current US$ 11.60 million current US$ 3.90 billion current US$ Early-demographic dividend
1990s 4.05 billion current US$ 30.75 million current US$ 4.01 billion current US$ Early-demographic dividend
2000s 4.36 billion current US$ 66.58 million current US$ 4.29 billion current US$ Early-demographic dividend
2010s 7.33 billion current US$ 260.23 million current US$ 7.07 billion current US$ Early-demographic dividend
2020s 8.63 billion current US$ 301.79 million current US$ 8.33 billion current US$ Early-demographic dividend

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$), Early-demographic dividend or Malawi?
Early-demographic dividend, at 8.33 billion current US$ against 431.21 million current US$ in Malawi as of 2022.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) between Early-demographic dividend and Malawi?
7.90 billion current US$, with Early-demographic dividend ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Early-demographic dividend and Malawi?
53 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2022.
How do Early-demographic dividend and Malawi rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$)?
Early-demographic dividend ranks 20th and Malawi ranks 22nd of 44 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Early-demographic dividend vs Malawi: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-states-current-us-gaps-filled/early-demographic-dividend/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-states-current-us-gaps-filled/early-demographic-dividend/malawi/">Early-demographic dividend vs Malawi: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
211 places, 9,809 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) with 200 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.