Eritrea vs Tuvalu: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$)
Eritrea
100,000 current US$
in 2020
Tuvalu
100,000 current US$
in 2023
Eritrea rank
149th
Tuvalu rank
149th
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) over time
- Eritrea
- Tuvalu
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 100,000 current US$ against 100,000 current US$ in Tuvalu, a difference of 0 current US$.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Eritrea has been ahead every year.
Eritrea ranks 149th and Tuvalu ranks 149th of 164 countries.
Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Tuvalu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.62 million current US$ | 10,000 current US$ | 3.61 million current US$ | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 270,038 current US$ | 46,574 current US$ | 223,464 current US$ | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$), Eritrea or Tuvalu?
- Eritrea, at 100,000 current US$ against 100,000 current US$ in Tuvalu as of 2020.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) between Eritrea and Tuvalu?
- 0 current US$, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Tuvalu?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2015.
- How do Eritrea and Tuvalu rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$)?
- Eritrea ranks 149th and Tuvalu ranks 149th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) with 200 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.