Estonia vs Oman: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$)
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) over time
- Estonia
- Oman
How they compare
Oman currently reports 3.02 million current US$ against 2.86 million current US$ in Estonia, a difference of 160,000 current US$.
That makes Oman's figure about 1.1 times Estonia's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 13 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Estonia ahead.
Estonia ranks 123rd and Oman ranks 121st of 164 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Estonia averaged higher in 1 and Oman in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Oman | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 8.16 million current US$ | 16.00 million current US$ | 7.84 million current US$ | Oman |
| 2000s | -386,000 current US$ | -4.51 million current US$ | 4.12 million current US$ | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$), Estonia or Oman?
- Oman, at 3.02 million current US$ against 2.86 million current US$ in Estonia as of 2010.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) between Estonia and Oman?
- 160,000 current US$, with Oman ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Oman?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2004.
- How do Estonia and Oman rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$)?
- Estonia ranks 123rd and Oman ranks 121st of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) with 200 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.