Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) vs South Sudan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$)

Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)
9.80 billion current US$
in 2022
South Sudan
709.88 million current US$
in 2023
Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) rank
15th
South Sudan rank
13th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) over time

  • Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)
  • South Sudan
02.0B4.0B6.0B8.0B10.0B197019962023

How they compare

Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) currently reports 9.80 billion current US$ against 709.88 million current US$ in South Sudan, a difference of 9.09 billion current US$.

That makes Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)'s figure about 13.8 times South Sudan's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) ahead.

Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 15th and South Sudan ranks 13th of 44 groups.

Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) South Sudan Difference Ahead
2010s 756.58 million current US$ 545.14 million current US$ 211.44 million current US$ Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)
2020s 3.79 billion current US$ 824.62 million current US$ 2.97 billion current US$ Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$), Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) or South Sudan?
Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries), at 9.80 billion current US$ against 709.88 million current US$ in South Sudan as of 2022.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) between Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) and South Sudan?
9.09 billion current US$, with Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) and South Sudan?
12 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2022.
How do Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) and South Sudan rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$)?
Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 15th and South Sudan ranks 13th of 44 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) vs South Sudan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-states-current-us-gaps-filled/europe-and-central-asia-ida-and-ibrd-countries/south-sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-states-current-us-gaps-filled/europe-and-central-asia-ida-and-ibrd-countries/south-sudan/">Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) vs South Sudan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
211 places, 9,809 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) with 200 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.