Grenada vs Tuvalu: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$)
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) over time
- Grenada
- Tuvalu
How they compare
Tuvalu currently reports 100,000 current US$ against 49,554 current US$ in Grenada, a difference of 50,446 current US$.
That makes Tuvalu's figure about 2.0 times Grenada's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Grenada ahead.
Grenada ranks 152nd and Tuvalu ranks 149th of 164 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Grenada averaged higher in 2 and Tuvalu in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Grenada | Tuvalu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 80,000 current US$ | 10,000 current US$ | 70,000 current US$ | Grenada |
| 2010s | 176,232 current US$ | 46,574 current US$ | 129,658 current US$ | Grenada |
| 2020s | 38,416 current US$ | 110,000 current US$ | 71,584 current US$ | Tuvalu |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$), Grenada or Tuvalu?
- Tuvalu, at 100,000 current US$ against 49,554 current US$ in Grenada as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) between Grenada and Tuvalu?
- 50,446 current US$, with Tuvalu ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Tuvalu?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2023.
- How do Grenada and Tuvalu rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$)?
- Grenada ranks 152nd and Tuvalu ranks 149th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) with 200 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.