Hungary vs Maldives: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$)
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) over time
- Hungary
- Maldives
How they compare
Maldives currently reports 1.65 million current US$ against 1.51 million current US$ in Hungary, a difference of 136,260 current US$.
That makes Maldives's figure about 1.1 times Hungary's.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Hungary has been ahead every year.
Hungary ranks 130th and Maldives ranks 128th of 164 countries.
Hungary has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hungary | Maldives | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3.62 million current US$ | 55,000 current US$ | 3.56 million current US$ | Hungary |
| 2000s | 1.87 million current US$ | -80,000 current US$ | 1.95 million current US$ | Hungary |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$), Hungary or Maldives?
- Maldives, at 1.65 million current US$ against 1.51 million current US$ in Hungary as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) between Hungary and Maldives?
- 136,260 current US$, with Maldives ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Maldives?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2004.
- How do Hungary and Maldives rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$)?
- Hungary ranks 130th and Maldives ranks 128th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) with 200 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.