Kenya vs Russia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United … States United gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United … States United gaps over time
- Kenya
- Russia
How they compare
Kenya currently reports 821.62 million current US$ against 716.42 million current US$ in Russia, a difference of 105.20 million current US$.
That makes Kenya's figure about 1.1 times Russia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kenya ahead.
Kenya ranks 10th and Russia ranks 12th of 164 countries.
Russia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kenya | Russia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 31.96 million current US$ | 470.14 million current US$ | 438.18 million current US$ | Russia |
| 2000s | 88.76 million current US$ | 758.71 million current US$ | 669.95 million current US$ | Russia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$), Kenya or Russia?
- Kenya, at 821.62 million current US$ against 716.42 million current US$ in Russia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) between Kenya and Russia?
- 105.20 million current US$, with Kenya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Russia?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2004.
- How do Kenya and Russia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$)?
- Kenya ranks 10th and Russia ranks 12th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) with 200 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.