Latin America & Caribbean vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$)

Latin America & Caribbean
2.85 billion current US$
in 2023
Zimbabwe
316.81 million current US$
in 2023
Latin America & Caribbean rank
26th
Zimbabwe rank
26th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) over time

  • Latin America & Caribbean
  • Zimbabwe
01.0B2.0B3.0B196019912023

How they compare

Latin America & Caribbean currently reports 2.85 billion current US$ against 316.81 million current US$ in Zimbabwe, a difference of 2.53 billion current US$.

That makes Latin America & Caribbean's figure about 9.0 times Zimbabwe's.

Across all 46 years both countries report, Latin America & Caribbean has been ahead every year.

Latin America & Caribbean ranks 26th and Zimbabwe ranks 26th of 44 groups.

Latin America & Caribbean has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latin America & Caribbean Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 699.25 million current US$ -25,000 current US$ 699.27 million current US$ Latin America & Caribbean
1980s 940.90 million current US$ 33.10 million current US$ 907.80 million current US$ Latin America & Caribbean
1990s 781.43 million current US$ 30.44 million current US$ 751.00 million current US$ Latin America & Caribbean
2000s 1.52 billion current US$ 83.13 million current US$ 1.43 billion current US$ Latin America & Caribbean
2010s 1.91 billion current US$ 191.85 million current US$ 1.72 billion current US$ Latin America & Caribbean
2020s 2.38 billion current US$ 307.88 million current US$ 2.07 billion current US$ Latin America & Caribbean

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$), Latin America & Caribbean or Zimbabwe?
Latin America & Caribbean, at 2.85 billion current US$ against 316.81 million current US$ in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) between Latin America & Caribbean and Zimbabwe?
2.53 billion current US$, with Latin America & Caribbean ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latin America & Caribbean and Zimbabwe?
46 years are reported by both, from 1966 to 2023.
How do Latin America & Caribbean and Zimbabwe rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$)?
Latin America & Caribbean ranks 26th and Zimbabwe ranks 26th of 44 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latin America & Caribbean vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-states-current-us-gaps-filled/latin-america-and-caribbean/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-states-current-us-gaps-filled/latin-america-and-caribbean/zimbabwe/">Latin America & Caribbean vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
211 places, 9,809 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) with 200 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.