Latvia vs Maldives: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$)
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) over time
- Latvia
- Maldives
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 2.77 million current US$ against 1.65 million current US$ in Maldives, a difference of 1.12 million current US$.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.7 times Maldives's.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Latvia ranks 125th and Maldives ranks 128th of 164 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Maldives | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.94 million current US$ | 55,000 current US$ | 2.89 million current US$ | Latvia |
| 2000s | 1.58 million current US$ | -80,000 current US$ | 1.66 million current US$ | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$), Latvia or Maldives?
- Latvia, at 2.77 million current US$ against 1.65 million current US$ in Maldives as of 2004.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) between Latvia and Maldives?
- 1.12 million current US$, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Maldives?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2004.
- How do Latvia and Maldives rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$)?
- Latvia ranks 125th and Maldives ranks 128th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) with 200 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.