Latvia vs Tonga: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$)
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) over time
- Latvia
- Tonga
How they compare
Tonga currently reports 3.02 million current US$ against 2.77 million current US$ in Latvia, a difference of 249,330 current US$.
That makes Tonga's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 125th and Tonga ranks 122nd of 164 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Tonga | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.48 million current US$ | 829,167 current US$ | 1.65 million current US$ | Latvia |
| 2000s | 1.58 million current US$ | 888,000 current US$ | 690,000 current US$ | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$), Latvia or Tonga?
- Tonga, at 3.02 million current US$ against 2.77 million current US$ in Latvia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) between Latvia and Tonga?
- 249,330 current US$, with Tonga ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Tonga?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2004.
- How do Latvia and Tonga rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$)?
- Latvia ranks 125th and Tonga ranks 122nd of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) with 200 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.