Nicaragua vs Romania: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$)
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) over time
- Nicaragua
- Romania
How they compare
Romania currently reports 38.00 million current US$ against 34.10 million current US$ in Nicaragua, a difference of 3.90 million current US$.
That makes Romania's figure about 1.1 times Nicaragua's.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Nicaragua has been ahead every year.
Nicaragua ranks 94th and Romania ranks 92nd of 164 countries.
Nicaragua has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nicaragua | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 95.77 million current US$ | 19.45 million current US$ | 76.32 million current US$ | Nicaragua |
| 2000s | 75.87 million current US$ | 47.36 million current US$ | 28.51 million current US$ | Nicaragua |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$), Nicaragua or Romania?
- Romania, at 38.00 million current US$ against 34.10 million current US$ in Nicaragua as of 2004.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) between Nicaragua and Romania?
- 3.90 million current US$, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and Romania?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2004.
- How do Nicaragua and Romania rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$)?
- Nicaragua ranks 94th and Romania ranks 92nd of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) with 200 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.