Slovenia vs Suriname: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$)
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) over time
- Slovenia
- Suriname
How they compare
Slovenia currently reports 300,000 current US$ against 204,398 current US$ in Suriname, a difference of 95,602 current US$.
That makes Slovenia's figure about 1.5 times Suriname's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 9 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Suriname ahead.
Slovenia ranks 141st and Suriname ranks 144th of 164 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Slovenia averaged higher in 1 and Suriname in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Slovenia | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 956,944 current US$ | 2.19 million current US$ | 1.23 million current US$ | Suriname |
| 2000s | 467,778 current US$ | 126,667 current US$ | 341,111 current US$ | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$), Slovenia or Suriname?
- Slovenia, at 300,000 current US$ against 204,398 current US$ in Suriname as of 2002.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) between Slovenia and Suriname?
- 95,602 current US$, with Slovenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Slovenia and Suriname?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2002.
- How do Slovenia and Suriname rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$)?
- Slovenia ranks 141st and Suriname ranks 144th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) with 200 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.