Tuvalu vs Uruguay: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$)
Tuvalu
100,000 current US$
in 2023
Uruguay
57,740 current US$
in 2017
Tuvalu rank
149th
Uruguay rank
151st
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) over time
- Tuvalu
- Uruguay
How they compare
Tuvalu currently reports 100,000 current US$ against 57,740 current US$ in Uruguay, a difference of 42,260 current US$.
That makes Tuvalu's figure about 1.7 times Uruguay's.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Uruguay has been ahead every year.
Tuvalu ranks 149th and Uruguay ranks 151st of 164 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Tuvalu | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 10,000 current US$ | 960,000 current US$ | 950,000 current US$ | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 46,574 current US$ | 648,224 current US$ | 601,650 current US$ | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$), Tuvalu or Uruguay?
- Tuvalu, at 100,000 current US$ against 57,740 current US$ in Uruguay as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) between Tuvalu and Uruguay?
- 42,260 current US$, with Tuvalu ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Tuvalu and Uruguay?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2015.
- How do Tuvalu and Uruguay rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$)?
- Tuvalu ranks 149th and Uruguay ranks 151st of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) with 200 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.