Eswatini vs Least developed countries: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$)

Eswatini
49.58 current US$ per person
in 2023
Least developed countries
10.31 current US$ per person
in 2022
Eswatini rank
12th
Least developed countries rank
13th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) over time

  • Eswatini
  • Least developed countries
0204060196519942023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 49.58 current US$ per person against 10.31 current US$ per person in Least developed countries, a difference of 39.27 current US$ per person.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 4.8 times Least developed countries's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Eswatini ahead.

Eswatini ranks 12th and Least developed countries ranks 13th of 164 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 5 and Least developed countries in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Least developed countries Difference Ahead
1970s 2.39 current US$ per person 1.13 current US$ per person 1.25 current US$ per person Eswatini
1980s 12.98 current US$ per person 2.04 current US$ per person 10.94 current US$ per person Eswatini
1990s 10.3 current US$ per person 1.89 current US$ per person 8.42 current US$ per person Eswatini
2000s 3.04 current US$ per person 5.35 current US$ per person 2.31 current US$ per person Least developed countries
2010s 40.01 current US$ per person 9.83 current US$ per person 30.19 current US$ per person Eswatini
2020s 51.33 current US$ per person 10.3 current US$ per person 41.04 current US$ per person Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$), Eswatini or Least developed countries?
Eswatini, at 49.58 current US$ per person against 10.31 current US$ per person in Least developed countries as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) between Eswatini and Least developed countries?
39.27 current US$ per person, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Least developed countries?
53 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2022.
How do Eswatini and Least developed countries rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$)?
Eswatini ranks 12th and Least developed countries ranks 13th of 164 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Least developed countries: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-states-current-us-per-capita/eswatini/least-developed-countries-un-classification/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-states-current-us-per-capita/eswatini/least-developed-countries-un-classification/">Eswatini vs Least developed countries: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$), per capita
Unit
current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
211 places, 9,609 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.