IBRD only vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$)

IBRD only
2.86 current US$ per person
in 2022
Zimbabwe
19.39 current US$ per person
in 2023
IBRD only rank
33rd
Zimbabwe rank
33rd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) over time

  • IBRD only
  • Zimbabwe
05101520196619942023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 19.39 current US$ per person against 2.86 current US$ per person in IBRD only, a difference of 16.53 current US$ per person.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 6.8 times IBRD only's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 43 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

IBRD only ranks 33rd and Zimbabwe ranks 33rd of 44 groups.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade IBRD only Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1980s 0.7325 current US$ per person 3.94 current US$ per person 3.21 current US$ per person Zimbabwe
1990s 0.8669 current US$ per person 2.79 current US$ per person 1.93 current US$ per person Zimbabwe
2000s 1.65 current US$ per person 6.49 current US$ per person 4.84 current US$ per person Zimbabwe
2010s 1.05 current US$ per person 13.36 current US$ per person 12.31 current US$ per person Zimbabwe
2020s 1.79 current US$ per person 19.3 current US$ per person 17.51 current US$ per person Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$), IBRD only or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 19.39 current US$ per person against 2.86 current US$ per person in IBRD only as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) between IBRD only and Zimbabwe?
16.53 current US$ per person, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for IBRD only and Zimbabwe?
43 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2022.
How do IBRD only and Zimbabwe rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$)?
IBRD only ranks 33rd and Zimbabwe ranks 33rd of 44 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

IBRD only vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-states-current-us-per-capita/ibrd-only/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-states-current-us-per-capita/ibrd-only/zimbabwe/">IBRD only vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$), per capita
Unit
current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
211 places, 9,609 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.