Bangladesh vs Eswatini: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$)

Bangladesh
3,461 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini
3,547 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bangladesh rank
19th
Eswatini rank
18th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Eswatini
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k196519942023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 3,547 current US$ per square kilometre against 3,461 current US$ per square kilometre in Bangladesh, a difference of 86 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1972 it was Bangladesh ahead.

Bangladesh ranks 19th and Eswatini ranks 18th of 162 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 4 and Eswatini in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Eswatini Difference Ahead
1970s 1,127 current US$ per square kilometre 72.67 current US$ per square kilometre 1,055 current US$ per square kilometre Bangladesh
1980s 1,228 current US$ per square kilometre 529.07 current US$ per square kilometre 698.56 current US$ per square kilometre Bangladesh
1990s 705.75 current US$ per square kilometre 570.35 current US$ per square kilometre 135.4 current US$ per square kilometre Bangladesh
2000s 490.39 current US$ per square kilometre 194.01 current US$ per square kilometre 296.38 current US$ per square kilometre Bangladesh
2010s 1,736 current US$ per square kilometre 2,664 current US$ per square kilometre 927.32 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2020s 3,033 current US$ per square kilometre 3,587 current US$ per square kilometre 553.54 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$), Bangladesh or Eswatini?
Eswatini, at 3,547 current US$ per square kilometre against 3,461 current US$ per square kilometre in Bangladesh as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) between Bangladesh and Eswatini?
86 current US$ per square kilometre, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Eswatini?
52 years are reported by both, from 1972 to 2023.
How do Bangladesh and Eswatini rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$)?
Bangladesh ranks 19th and Eswatini ranks 18th of 162 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Eswatini: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-states-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-states-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/eswatini/">Bangladesh vs Eswatini: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
209 places, 9,389 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.