Burundi vs Eswatini: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$)

Burundi
3,394 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini
3,547 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Burundi rank
21st
Eswatini rank
18th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) over time

  • Burundi
  • Eswatini
05.0k10.0k15.0k196219922023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 3,547 current US$ per square kilometre against 3,394 current US$ per square kilometre in Burundi, a difference of 153 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Burundi ahead.

Burundi ranks 21st and Eswatini ranks 18th of 162 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Burundi averaged higher in 3 and Eswatini in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burundi Eswatini Difference Ahead
1960s 14.99 current US$ per square kilometre 4.22 current US$ per square kilometre 10.78 current US$ per square kilometre Burundi
1970s 58.41 current US$ per square kilometre 67.83 current US$ per square kilometre 9.42 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1980s 241.43 current US$ per square kilometre 529.07 current US$ per square kilometre 287.64 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1990s 438.32 current US$ per square kilometre 570.35 current US$ per square kilometre 132.03 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2000s 1,265 current US$ per square kilometre 194.01 current US$ per square kilometre 1,071 current US$ per square kilometre Burundi
2010s 3,177 current US$ per square kilometre 2,664 current US$ per square kilometre 513.73 current US$ per square kilometre Burundi
2020s 2,611 current US$ per square kilometre 3,587 current US$ per square kilometre 975.7 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$), Burundi or Eswatini?
Eswatini, at 3,547 current US$ per square kilometre against 3,394 current US$ per square kilometre in Burundi as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) between Burundi and Eswatini?
153 current US$ per square kilometre, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Eswatini?
54 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.
How do Burundi and Eswatini rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$)?
Burundi ranks 21st and Eswatini ranks 18th of 162 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burundi vs Eswatini: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-states-current-us-per-square-kilometre/burundi/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-states-current-us-per-square-kilometre/burundi/eswatini/">Burundi vs Eswatini: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
209 places, 9,389 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.