Congo vs Mauritania: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$)

Congo
39.31 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritania
31.29 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
126th
Mauritania rank
128th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) over time

  • Congo
  • Mauritania
020406080196319932023

How they compare

Congo currently reports 39.31 current US$ per square kilometre against 31.29 current US$ per square kilometre in Mauritania, a difference of 8.02 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.3 times Mauritania's.

The two have swapped places 14 times across 44 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Congo ahead.

Congo ranks 126th and Mauritania ranks 128th of 162 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 5 and Mauritania in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Mauritania Difference Ahead
1960s 4.3 current US$ per square kilometre 0.1843 current US$ per square kilometre 4.12 current US$ per square kilometre Congo
1980s 5.86 current US$ per square kilometre 17.74 current US$ per square kilometre 11.88 current US$ per square kilometre Mauritania
1990s 12.91 current US$ per square kilometre 3.06 current US$ per square kilometre 9.86 current US$ per square kilometre Congo
2000s 19.99 current US$ per square kilometre 12.89 current US$ per square kilometre 7.11 current US$ per square kilometre Congo
2010s 23.13 current US$ per square kilometre 14.99 current US$ per square kilometre 8.14 current US$ per square kilometre Congo
2020s 45.5 current US$ per square kilometre 22.45 current US$ per square kilometre 23.06 current US$ per square kilometre Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$), Congo or Mauritania?
Congo, at 39.31 current US$ per square kilometre against 31.29 current US$ per square kilometre in Mauritania as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) between Congo and Mauritania?
8.02 current US$ per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Mauritania?
44 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.
How do Congo and Mauritania rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$)?
Congo ranks 126th and Mauritania ranks 128th of 162 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Mauritania: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-states-current-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/mauritania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-states-current-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/mauritania/">Congo vs Mauritania: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
209 places, 9,389 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.