Eswatini vs IDA blend: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$)

Eswatini
3,547 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
IDA blend
428.66 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Eswatini rank
18th
IDA blend rank
21st

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) over time

  • Eswatini
  • IDA blend
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k196519942023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 3,547 current US$ per square kilometre against 428.66 current US$ per square kilometre in IDA blend, a difference of 3,118 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 8.3 times IDA blend's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1970 it was IDA blend ahead.

Eswatini ranks 18th and IDA blend ranks 21st of 162 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 5 and IDA blend in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini IDA blend Difference Ahead
1970s 69.77 current US$ per square kilometre 35.56 current US$ per square kilometre 34.2 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1980s 529.07 current US$ per square kilometre 58.64 current US$ per square kilometre 470.43 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1990s 570.35 current US$ per square kilometre 26.89 current US$ per square kilometre 543.46 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2000s 194.01 current US$ per square kilometre 198.25 current US$ per square kilometre 4.24 current US$ per square kilometre IDA blend
2010s 2,664 current US$ per square kilometre 477.2 current US$ per square kilometre 2,186 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2020s 3,600 current US$ per square kilometre 476.71 current US$ per square kilometre 3,123 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$), Eswatini or IDA blend?
Eswatini, at 3,547 current US$ per square kilometre against 428.66 current US$ per square kilometre in IDA blend as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) between Eswatini and IDA blend?
3,118 current US$ per square kilometre, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and IDA blend?
53 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2022.
How do Eswatini and IDA blend rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$)?
Eswatini ranks 18th and IDA blend ranks 21st of 162 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs IDA blend: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-states-current-us-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/ida-blend/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-states-current-us-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/ida-blend/">Eswatini vs IDA blend: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
209 places, 9,389 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.