Eswatini vs Uganda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$)

Eswatini
3,547 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Uganda
3,407 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini rank
18th
Uganda rank
20th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) over time

  • Eswatini
  • Uganda
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k196219922023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 3,547 current US$ per square kilometre against 3,407 current US$ per square kilometre in Uganda, a difference of 140 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Uganda ahead.

Eswatini ranks 18th and Uganda ranks 20th of 162 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 5 and Uganda in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Uganda Difference Ahead
1960s 4.22 current US$ per square kilometre 20.78 current US$ per square kilometre 16.57 current US$ per square kilometre Uganda
1970s 69.77 current US$ per square kilometre 16.02 current US$ per square kilometre 53.75 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1980s 529.07 current US$ per square kilometre 44.54 current US$ per square kilometre 484.53 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1990s 570.35 current US$ per square kilometre 196.26 current US$ per square kilometre 374.09 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2000s 194.01 current US$ per square kilometre 1,057 current US$ per square kilometre 862.92 current US$ per square kilometre Uganda
2010s 2,664 current US$ per square kilometre 2,374 current US$ per square kilometre 289.23 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2020s 3,587 current US$ per square kilometre 3,207 current US$ per square kilometre 379.64 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$), Eswatini or Uganda?
Eswatini, at 3,547 current US$ per square kilometre against 3,407 current US$ per square kilometre in Uganda as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) between Eswatini and Uganda?
140 current US$ per square kilometre, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Uganda?
53 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Uganda rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$)?
Eswatini ranks 18th and Uganda ranks 20th of 162 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Uganda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-states-current-us-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-states-current-us-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/uganda/">Eswatini vs Uganda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
209 places, 9,389 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.