Gambia vs OECD members: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$)

Gambia
1,225 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
OECD members
23.76 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Gambia rank
40th
OECD members rank
41st

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) over time

  • Gambia
  • OECD members
05001.0k1.5k2.0k196519942023

How they compare

Gambia currently reports 1,225 current US$ per square kilometre against 23.76 current US$ per square kilometre in OECD members, a difference of 1,201 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Gambia's figure about 51.6 times OECD members's.

Across all 51 years both countries report, Gambia has been ahead every year.

Gambia ranks 40th and OECD members ranks 41st of 162 countries.

Gambia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Gambia OECD members Difference Ahead
1970s 111.17 current US$ per square kilometre 17.97 current US$ per square kilometre 93.2 current US$ per square kilometre Gambia
1980s 800.4 current US$ per square kilometre 39.77 current US$ per square kilometre 760.62 current US$ per square kilometre Gambia
1990s 677.57 current US$ per square kilometre 45.11 current US$ per square kilometre 632.46 current US$ per square kilometre Gambia
2000s 394.37 current US$ per square kilometre 21.96 current US$ per square kilometre 372.41 current US$ per square kilometre Gambia
2010s 469.02 current US$ per square kilometre 17.1 current US$ per square kilometre 451.92 current US$ per square kilometre Gambia
2020s 331.06 current US$ per square kilometre 24.2 current US$ per square kilometre 306.86 current US$ per square kilometre Gambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$), Gambia or OECD members?
Gambia, at 1,225 current US$ per square kilometre against 23.76 current US$ per square kilometre in OECD members as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) between Gambia and OECD members?
1,201 current US$ per square kilometre, with Gambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and OECD members?
51 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2022.
How do Gambia and OECD members rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$)?
Gambia ranks 40th and OECD members ranks 41st of 162 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Gambia vs OECD members: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-states-current-us-per-square-kilometre/gambia-the/oecd-members/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-states-current-us-per-square-kilometre/gambia-the/oecd-members/">Gambia vs OECD members: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
209 places, 9,389 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.