Georgia vs IBRD only: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$)

Georgia
1,508 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
IBRD only
199.39 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Georgia rank
34th
IBRD only rank
32nd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) over time

  • Georgia
  • IBRD only
02.0k4.0k6.0k197019962023

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 1,508 current US$ per square kilometre against 199.39 current US$ per square kilometre in IBRD only, a difference of 1,309 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Georgia's figure about 7.6 times IBRD only's.

Across all 30 years both countries report, Georgia has been ahead every year.

Georgia ranks 34th and IBRD only ranks 32nd of 162 countries.

Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Georgia IBRD only Difference Ahead
1990s 650.12 current US$ per square kilometre 38.42 current US$ per square kilometre 611.71 current US$ per square kilometre Georgia
2000s 2,033 current US$ per square kilometre 98.34 current US$ per square kilometre 1,935 current US$ per square kilometre Georgia
2010s 1,854 current US$ per square kilometre 68.8 current US$ per square kilometre 1,785 current US$ per square kilometre Georgia
2020s 958.19 current US$ per square kilometre 124.22 current US$ per square kilometre 833.97 current US$ per square kilometre Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$), Georgia or IBRD only?
Georgia, at 1,508 current US$ per square kilometre against 199.39 current US$ per square kilometre in IBRD only as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) between Georgia and IBRD only?
1,309 current US$ per square kilometre, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and IBRD only?
30 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2022.
How do Georgia and IBRD only rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$)?
Georgia ranks 34th and IBRD only ranks 32nd of 162 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Georgia vs IBRD only: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-states-current-us-per-square-kilometre/georgia/ibrd-only/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-states-current-us-per-square-kilometre/georgia/ibrd-only/">Georgia vs IBRD only: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
209 places, 9,389 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.