Hong Kong, China vs Korea: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$)

Hong Kong, China
-990.1 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1975
Korea
-455.84 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1999
Hong Kong, China rank
161st
Korea rank
159th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) over time

  • Hong Kong, China
  • Korea
02.0k4.0k196119801999

How they compare

Korea currently reports -455.84 current US$ per square kilometre against -990.1 current US$ per square kilometre in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 534.26 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 9 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.

Hong Kong, China ranks 161st and Korea ranks 159th of 162 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Hong Kong, China averaged higher in 1 and Korea in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong, China Korea Difference Ahead
1960s 2,195 current US$ per square kilometre 2,118 current US$ per square kilometre 76.45 current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
1970s -990.1 current US$ per square kilometre 912.29 current US$ per square kilometre 1,902 current US$ per square kilometre Korea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$), Hong Kong, China or Korea?
Korea, at -455.84 current US$ per square kilometre against -990.1 current US$ per square kilometre in Hong Kong, China as of 1999.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) between Hong Kong, China and Korea?
534.26 current US$ per square kilometre, with Korea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Korea?
9 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1975.
How do Hong Kong, China and Korea rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$)?
Hong Kong, China ranks 161st and Korea ranks 159th of 162 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs Korea: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-states-current-us-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/korea-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-states-current-us-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/korea-rep/">Hong Kong, China vs Korea: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
209 places, 9,389 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.