IBRD only vs Sri Lanka: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$)

IBRD only
199.39 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Sri Lanka
1,640 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
IBRD only rank
32nd
Sri Lanka rank
31st

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) over time

  • IBRD only
  • Sri Lanka
05001.0k1.5k196119922023

How they compare

Sri Lanka currently reports 1,640 current US$ per square kilometre against 199.39 current US$ per square kilometre in IBRD only, a difference of 1,441 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 8.2 times IBRD only's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Sri Lanka ahead.

IBRD only ranks 32nd and Sri Lanka ranks 31st of 44 groups.

Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade IBRD only Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1970s 24.43 current US$ per square kilometre 357.2 current US$ per square kilometre 332.77 current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
1980s 45.95 current US$ per square kilometre 865.89 current US$ per square kilometre 819.94 current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
1990s 50.88 current US$ per square kilometre 570.16 current US$ per square kilometre 519.28 current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2000s 98.34 current US$ per square kilometre 270.15 current US$ per square kilometre 171.8 current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2010s 68.8 current US$ per square kilometre 234.88 current US$ per square kilometre 166.09 current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2020s 124.22 current US$ per square kilometre 452.65 current US$ per square kilometre 328.43 current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$), IBRD only or Sri Lanka?
Sri Lanka, at 1,640 current US$ per square kilometre against 199.39 current US$ per square kilometre in IBRD only as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) between IBRD only and Sri Lanka?
1,441 current US$ per square kilometre, with Sri Lanka ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for IBRD only and Sri Lanka?
53 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2022.
How do IBRD only and Sri Lanka rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$)?
IBRD only ranks 32nd and Sri Lanka ranks 31st of 44 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

IBRD only vs Sri Lanka: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-states-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ibrd-only/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-states-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ibrd-only/sri-lanka/">IBRD only vs Sri Lanka: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
209 places, 9,389 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.