IDA total vs Malawi: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$)

IDA total
602.81 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Malawi
4,574 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
IDA total rank
11th
Malawi rank
14th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) over time

  • IDA total
  • Malawi
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k5.0k196419932023

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 4,574 current US$ per square kilometre against 602.81 current US$ per square kilometre in IDA total, a difference of 3,971 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Malawi's figure about 7.6 times IDA total's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Malawi ahead.

IDA total ranks 11th and Malawi ranks 14th of 44 groups.

Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade IDA total Malawi Difference Ahead
1970s 31.49 current US$ per square kilometre 41.25 current US$ per square kilometre 9.76 current US$ per square kilometre Malawi
1980s 66.32 current US$ per square kilometre 123.04 current US$ per square kilometre 56.71 current US$ per square kilometre Malawi
1990s 71.46 current US$ per square kilometre 326.21 current US$ per square kilometre 254.75 current US$ per square kilometre Malawi
2000s 248.75 current US$ per square kilometre 706.14 current US$ per square kilometre 457.39 current US$ per square kilometre Malawi
2010s 518.73 current US$ per square kilometre 2,760 current US$ per square kilometre 2,241 current US$ per square kilometre Malawi
2020s 606.26 current US$ per square kilometre 3,201 current US$ per square kilometre 2,595 current US$ per square kilometre Malawi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$), IDA total or Malawi?
Malawi, at 4,574 current US$ per square kilometre against 602.81 current US$ per square kilometre in IDA total as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) between IDA total and Malawi?
3,971 current US$ per square kilometre, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for IDA total and Malawi?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2022.
How do IDA total and Malawi rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$)?
IDA total ranks 11th and Malawi ranks 14th of 44 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

IDA total vs Malawi: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-states-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ida-total/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-states-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ida-total/malawi/">IDA total vs Malawi: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
209 places, 9,389 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.