Lithuania vs Malaysia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$)
Lithuania
25.21 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2004
Malaysia
25.99 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Lithuania rank
130th
Malaysia rank
129th
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) over time
- Lithuania
- Malaysia
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 25.99 current US$ per square kilometre against 25.21 current US$ per square kilometre in Lithuania, a difference of 0.78 current US$ per square kilometre.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Lithuania ahead.
Lithuania ranks 130th and Malaysia ranks 129th of 162 countries.
Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$), Lithuania or Malaysia?
- Malaysia, at 25.99 current US$ per square kilometre against 25.21 current US$ per square kilometre in Lithuania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) between Lithuania and Malaysia?
- 0.78 current US$ per square kilometre, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Malaysia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2004.
- How do Lithuania and Malaysia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$)?
- Lithuania ranks 130th and Malaysia ranks 129th of 162 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.