Malawi vs Rwanda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$)

Malawi
4,574 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
7,252 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Malawi rank
14th
Rwanda rank
11th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) over time

  • Malawi
  • Rwanda
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k196219922023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 7,252 current US$ per square kilometre against 4,574 current US$ per square kilometre in Malawi, a difference of 2,678 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.6 times Malawi's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 58 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Malawi ahead.

Malawi ranks 14th and Rwanda ranks 11th of 162 countries.

Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malawi Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 30.78 current US$ per square kilometre 52.13 current US$ per square kilometre 21.35 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
1970s 41.25 current US$ per square kilometre 90.08 current US$ per square kilometre 48.83 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
1980s 123.04 current US$ per square kilometre 526.96 current US$ per square kilometre 403.92 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
1990s 326.21 current US$ per square kilometre 1,823 current US$ per square kilometre 1,497 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
2000s 706.14 current US$ per square kilometre 2,805 current US$ per square kilometre 2,099 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
2010s 2,760 current US$ per square kilometre 6,873 current US$ per square kilometre 4,112 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda
2020s 3,544 current US$ per square kilometre 6,995 current US$ per square kilometre 3,451 current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$), Malawi or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 7,252 current US$ per square kilometre against 4,574 current US$ per square kilometre in Malawi as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) between Malawi and Rwanda?
2,678 current US$ per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Rwanda?
58 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.
How do Malawi and Rwanda rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$)?
Malawi ranks 14th and Rwanda ranks 11th of 162 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malawi vs Rwanda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-states-current-us-per-square-kilometre/malawi/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-states-current-us-per-square-kilometre/malawi/rwanda/">Malawi vs Rwanda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
209 places, 9,389 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.