OECD members vs South Sudan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$)

OECD members
23.76 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
South Sudan
1,123 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
OECD members rank
41st
South Sudan rank
41st

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) over time

  • OECD members
  • South Sudan
05001.0k1.5k197019962023

How they compare

South Sudan currently reports 1,123 current US$ per square kilometre against 23.76 current US$ per square kilometre in OECD members, a difference of 1,099 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes South Sudan's figure about 47.3 times OECD members's.

Across all 11 years both countries report, South Sudan has been ahead every year.

OECD members ranks 41st and South Sudan ranks 41st of 44 groups.

South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade OECD members South Sudan Difference Ahead
2010s 16.76 current US$ per square kilometre 959.35 current US$ per square kilometre 942.6 current US$ per square kilometre South Sudan
2020s 24.2 current US$ per square kilometre 1,305 current US$ per square kilometre 1,281 current US$ per square kilometre South Sudan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$), OECD members or South Sudan?
South Sudan, at 1,123 current US$ per square kilometre against 23.76 current US$ per square kilometre in OECD members as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) between OECD members and South Sudan?
1,099 current US$ per square kilometre, with South Sudan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for OECD members and South Sudan?
11 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2022.
How do OECD members and South Sudan rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$)?
OECD members ranks 41st and South Sudan ranks 41st of 44 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

OECD members vs South Sudan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-states-current-us-per-square-kilometre/oecd-members/south-sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-states-current-us-per-square-kilometre/oecd-members/south-sudan/">OECD members vs South Sudan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
209 places, 9,389 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.