Panama vs Zambia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$)

Panama
648.7 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
583.4 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Panama rank
63rd
Zambia rank
65th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) over time

  • Panama
  • Zambia
05001.0k1.5k196119922023

How they compare

Panama currently reports 648.7 current US$ per square kilometre against 583.4 current US$ per square kilometre in Zambia, a difference of 65.3 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Panama's figure about 1.1 times Zambia's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Panama ahead.

Panama ranks 63rd and Zambia ranks 65th of 162 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Panama averaged higher in 4 and Zambia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Panama Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 220.96 current US$ per square kilometre 1.18 current US$ per square kilometre 219.78 current US$ per square kilometre Panama
1970s 253.34 current US$ per square kilometre 22.64 current US$ per square kilometre 230.7 current US$ per square kilometre Panama
1980s 267.69 current US$ per square kilometre 40.49 current US$ per square kilometre 227.2 current US$ per square kilometre Panama
1990s 448.24 current US$ per square kilometre 37.35 current US$ per square kilometre 410.89 current US$ per square kilometre Panama
2000s 109.81 current US$ per square kilometre 176.64 current US$ per square kilometre 66.83 current US$ per square kilometre Zambia
2010s 144.64 current US$ per square kilometre 452.98 current US$ per square kilometre 308.34 current US$ per square kilometre Zambia
2020s 429.88 current US$ per square kilometre 549.5 current US$ per square kilometre 119.62 current US$ per square kilometre Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$), Panama or Zambia?
Panama, at 648.7 current US$ per square kilometre against 583.4 current US$ per square kilometre in Zambia as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) between Panama and Zambia?
65.3 current US$ per square kilometre, with Panama ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Zambia?
55 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.
How do Panama and Zambia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$)?
Panama ranks 63rd and Zambia ranks 65th of 162 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Panama vs Zambia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-states-current-us-per-square-kilometre/panama/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-states-current-us-per-square-kilometre/panama/zambia/">Panama vs Zambia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
209 places, 9,389 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.