Tunisia vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$)

Tunisia
823.04 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
818.96 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tunisia rank
53rd
Zimbabwe rank
54th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) over time

  • Tunisia
  • Zimbabwe
-25002505007501.0k196119922023

How they compare

Tunisia currently reports 823.04 current US$ per square kilometre against 818.96 current US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 4.08 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 46 shared years of data; in 1966 it was Tunisia ahead.

Tunisia ranks 53rd and Zimbabwe ranks 54th of 162 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Tunisia averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Tunisia Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 282.12 current US$ per square kilometre -0.0646 current US$ per square kilometre 282.18 current US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
1980s 124.23 current US$ per square kilometre 85.56 current US$ per square kilometre 38.66 current US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
1990s -53.26 current US$ per square kilometre 78.68 current US$ per square kilometre 131.94 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s -92.8 current US$ per square kilometre 214.89 current US$ per square kilometre 307.68 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 254.55 current US$ per square kilometre 495.93 current US$ per square kilometre 241.38 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 648.62 current US$ per square kilometre 795.85 current US$ per square kilometre 147.23 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$), Tunisia or Zimbabwe?
Tunisia, at 823.04 current US$ per square kilometre against 818.96 current US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) between Tunisia and Zimbabwe?
4.08 current US$ per square kilometre, with Tunisia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Tunisia and Zimbabwe?
46 years are reported by both, from 1966 to 2023.
How do Tunisia and Zimbabwe rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$)?
Tunisia ranks 53rd and Zimbabwe ranks 54th of 162 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Tunisia vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-states-current-us-per-square-kilometre/tunisia/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-states-current-us-per-square-kilometre/tunisia/zimbabwe/">Tunisia vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
209 places, 9,389 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.