Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Israel: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$)

Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)
0.0019 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2022
Israel
0.0196 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 1996
Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) rank
16th
Israel rank
19th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) over time

  • Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)
  • Israel
00.020.040.06196019912022

How they compare

Israel currently reports 0.0196 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0019 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries), a difference of 0.0177 current US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Israel's figure about 10.5 times Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)'s.

Across all 9 years both countries report, Israel has been ahead every year.

Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 16th and Israel ranks 19th of 44 groups.

Israel has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) Israel Difference Ahead
1980s -0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0223 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0224 current US$ per US$ of GDP Israel
1990s 0.001 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0164 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0153 current US$ per US$ of GDP Israel

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$), Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) or Israel?
Israel, at 0.0196 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0019 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) as of 1996.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) between Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) and Israel?
0.0177 current US$ per US$ of GDP, with Israel ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) and Israel?
9 years are reported by both, from 1988 to 1996.
How do Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) and Israel rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$)?
Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 16th and Israel ranks 19th of 44 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Israel: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-states-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/europe-and-central-asia-ida-and-ibrd-countries/israel/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-states-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/europe-and-central-asia-ida-and-ibrd-countries/israel/">Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Israel: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
current US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
208 places, 9,222 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.