Grenada vs Sao Tome and Principe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$)

Grenada
0 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe
0 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Grenada rank
135th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
136th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) over time

  • Grenada
  • Sao Tome and Principe
00.050.10.15198220022023

How they compare

Grenada currently reports 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Grenada's figure about 1.2 times Sao Tome and Principe's.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 21 shared years of data; in 1984 it was Grenada ahead.

Grenada ranks 135th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 136th of 161 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Grenada averaged higher in 2 and Sao Tome and Principe in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Grenada Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1980s 0.1374 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0128 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1246 current US$ per US$ of GDP Grenada
1990s 0.0003 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0014 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0011 current US$ per US$ of GDP Sao Tome and Principe
2000s 0.0016 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0021 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0005 current US$ per US$ of GDP Sao Tome and Principe
2010s 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0003 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0002 current US$ per US$ of GDP Sao Tome and Principe
2020s 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP Grenada

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$), Grenada or Sao Tome and Principe?
Grenada, at 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) between Grenada and Sao Tome and Principe?
0 current US$ per US$ of GDP, with Grenada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Sao Tome and Principe?
21 years are reported by both, from 1984 to 2023.
How do Grenada and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$)?
Grenada ranks 135th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 136th of 161 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Grenada vs Sao Tome and Principe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-states-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/grenada/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-states-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/grenada/sao-tome-and-principe/">Grenada vs Sao Tome and Principe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
current US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
208 places, 9,222 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.