IDA & IBRD total vs Zambia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$)

IDA & IBRD total
0.0007 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2022
Zambia
0.0157 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2023
IDA & IBRD total rank
24th
Zambia rank
23rd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) over time

  • IDA & IBRD total
  • Zambia
00.0050.010.0150.020.025196519942023

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 0.0157 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0007 current US$ per US$ of GDP in IDA & IBRD total, a difference of 0.015 current US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Zambia's figure about 21.9 times IDA & IBRD total's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 49 shared years of data; in 1970 it was IDA & IBRD total ahead.

IDA & IBRD total ranks 24th and Zambia ranks 23rd of 44 groups.

Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade IDA & IBRD total Zambia Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0013 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0057 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0044 current US$ per US$ of GDP Zambia
1980s 0.0012 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0109 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0097 current US$ per US$ of GDP Zambia
1990s 0.001 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0079 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0069 current US$ per US$ of GDP Zambia
2000s 0.0012 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0135 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0123 current US$ per US$ of GDP Zambia
2010s 0.0006 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0139 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0133 current US$ per US$ of GDP Zambia
2020s 0.0006 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0179 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0173 current US$ per US$ of GDP Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$), IDA & IBRD total or Zambia?
Zambia, at 0.0157 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0007 current US$ per US$ of GDP in IDA & IBRD total as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$) between IDA & IBRD total and Zambia?
0.015 current US$ per US$ of GDP, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for IDA & IBRD total and Zambia?
49 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2022.
How do IDA & IBRD total and Zambia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states (current us$)?
IDA & IBRD total ranks 24th and Zambia ranks 23rd of 44 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

IDA & IBRD total vs Zambia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-states-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/ida-and-ibrd-total/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-states-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/ida-and-ibrd-total/zambia/">IDA & IBRD total vs Zambia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
current US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
208 places, 9,222 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.