Côte d'Ivoire vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States

Côte d'Ivoire
278.95 million current US$
in 2023
Zimbabwe
316.81 million current US$
in 2023
Côte d'Ivoire rank
28th
Zimbabwe rank
26th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States over time

  • Côte d'Ivoire
  • Zimbabwe
0100.0M200.0M300.0M196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 316.81 million current US$ against 278.95 million current US$ in Côte d'Ivoire, a difference of 37.86 million current US$.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Côte d'Ivoire's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 40 shared years of data; in 1966 it was Côte d'Ivoire ahead.

Côte d'Ivoire ranks 28th and Zimbabwe ranks 26th of 164 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Côte d'Ivoire averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Côte d'Ivoire Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 2.81 million current US$ -25,000 current US$ 2.84 million current US$ Côte d'Ivoire
1980s 2.75 million current US$ 21.50 million current US$ 18.75 million current US$ Zimbabwe
1990s 16.77 million current US$ 30.44 million current US$ 13.67 million current US$ Zimbabwe
2000s 57.05 million current US$ 83.13 million current US$ 26.07 million current US$ Zimbabwe
2010s 128.38 million current US$ 191.85 million current US$ 63.47 million current US$ Zimbabwe
2020s 212.00 million current US$ 307.88 million current US$ 95.87 million current US$ Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states, Côte d'Ivoire or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 316.81 million current US$ against 278.95 million current US$ in Côte d'Ivoire as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states between Côte d'Ivoire and Zimbabwe?
37.86 million current US$, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Côte d'Ivoire and Zimbabwe?
40 years are reported by both, from 1966 to 2023.
How do Côte d'Ivoire and Zimbabwe rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states?
Côte d'Ivoire ranks 28th and Zimbabwe ranks 26th of 164 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Côte d'Ivoire vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States. Statizoid, drawing on Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-states-current-us/cote-d-ivoire/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-states-current-us/cote-d-ivoire/zimbabwe/">Côte d'Ivoire vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
211 places, 9,609 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors are the net disbursements of official development assistance (ODA) or official aid from the members of the Development Assistance Committee (DAC). Net disbursements are gross disbursements of grants and loans minus repayments of principal on earlier loans. ODA consists of loans made on concessional terms (with a grant element of at least 25 percent, calculated at a rate of discount of 10 percent) and grants made to promote economic development and welfare in countries and territories in the DAC list of ODA recipients. Official aid refers to aid flows from official donors to countries and territories in part II of the DAC list of recipients: more advanced countries of Central and Eastern Europe, the countries of the former Soviet Union, and certain advanced developing countries and territories. Official aid is provided under terms and conditions similar to those for ODA. Part II of the DAC List was abolished in 2005. The collection of data on official aid and other resource flows to Part II countries ended with 2004 data. DAC members are Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States, and European Union Institutions. Regional aggregates include data for economies not specified elsewhere. World and income group totals include aid not allocated by country or region. Data are in current U.S. dollars.