Eritrea vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States over time
- Eritrea
- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
How they compare
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines currently reports 117,785 current US$ against 100,000 current US$ in Eritrea, a difference of 17,785 current US$.
That makes Saint Vincent and the Grenadines's figure about 1.2 times Eritrea's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 20 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Eritrea ahead.
Eritrea ranks 149th and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 146th of 164 countries.
Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 15.84 million current US$ | -200,000 current US$ | 16.04 million current US$ | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 45.68 million current US$ | -87,000 current US$ | 45.77 million current US$ | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 332,498 current US$ | -5,634 current US$ | 338,132 current US$ | Eritrea |
| 2020s | 100,000 current US$ | -205,681 current US$ | 305,681 current US$ | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states, Eritrea or Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, at 117,785 current US$ against 100,000 current US$ in Eritrea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states between Eritrea and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 17,785 current US$, with Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2020.
- How do Eritrea and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states?
- Eritrea ranks 149th and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 146th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors are the net disbursements of official development assistance (ODA) or official aid from the members of the Development Assistance Committee (DAC). Net disbursements are gross disbursements of grants and loans minus repayments of principal on earlier loans. ODA consists of loans made on concessional terms (with a grant element of at least 25 percent, calculated at a rate of discount of 10 percent) and grants made to promote economic development and welfare in countries and territories in the DAC list of ODA recipients. Official aid refers to aid flows from official donors to countries and territories in part II of the DAC list of recipients: more advanced countries of Central and Eastern Europe, the countries of the former Soviet Union, and certain advanced developing countries and territories. Official aid is provided under terms and conditions similar to those for ODA. Part II of the DAC List was abolished in 2005. The collection of data on official aid and other resource flows to Part II countries ended with 2004 data. DAC members are Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States, and European Union Institutions. Regional aggregates include data for economies not specified elsewhere. World and income group totals include aid not allocated by country or region. Data are in current U.S. dollars.