Grenada vs Uruguay: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States over time
- Grenada
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 57,740 current US$ against 49,554 current US$ in Grenada, a difference of 8,186 current US$.
That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.2 times Grenada's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 22 shared years of data; in 1984 it was Grenada ahead.
Grenada ranks 151st and Uruguay ranks 150th of 163 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Grenada averaged higher in 2 and Uruguay in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Grenada | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 14.50 million current US$ | 500,000 current US$ | 14.00 million current US$ | Grenada |
| 1990s | 125,000 current US$ | 455,000 current US$ | 330,000 current US$ | Uruguay |
| 2000s | 1.00 million current US$ | -530,000 current US$ | 1.53 million current US$ | Grenada |
| 2010s | 167,128 current US$ | 653,868 current US$ | 486,740 current US$ | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states, Grenada or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 57,740 current US$ against 49,554 current US$ in Grenada as of 2017.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states between Grenada and Uruguay?
- 8,186 current US$, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Uruguay?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 1984 to 2017.
- How do Grenada and Uruguay rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states?
- Grenada ranks 151st and Uruguay ranks 150th of 163 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors are the net disbursements of official development assistance (ODA) or official aid from the members of the Development Assistance Committee (DAC). Net disbursements are gross disbursements of grants and loans minus repayments of principal on earlier loans. ODA consists of loans made on concessional terms (with a grant element of at least 25 percent, calculated at a rate of discount of 10 percent) and grants made to promote economic development and welfare in countries and territories in the DAC list of ODA recipients. Official aid refers to aid flows from official donors to countries and territories in part II of the DAC list of recipients: more advanced countries of Central and Eastern Europe, the countries of the former Soviet Union, and certain advanced developing countries and territories. Official aid is provided under terms and conditions similar to those for ODA. Part II of the DAC List was abolished in 2005. The collection of data on official aid and other resource flows to Part II countries ended with 2004 data. DAC members are Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States, and European Union Institutions. Regional aggregates include data for economies not specified elsewhere. World and income group totals include aid not allocated by country or region. Data are in current U.S. dollars.