South Korea vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States

South Korea
-43.97 million current US$
in 1999
Saint Kitts and Nevis
-1.03 million current US$
in 2012
South Korea rank
164th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
163rd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States over time

  • South Korea
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
-100.0M0100.0M200.0M196019862012

How they compare

Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports -1.03 million current US$ against -43.97 million current US$ in South Korea, a difference of 42.94 million current US$.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Saint Kitts and Nevis has been ahead every year.

South Korea ranks 164th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 163rd of 164 countries.

Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Korea Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
1980s -30.00 million current US$ 5.00 million current US$ 35.00 million current US$ Saint Kitts and Nevis
1990s -39.58 million current US$ 500,000 current US$ 40.08 million current US$ Saint Kitts and Nevis

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states, South Korea or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Saint Kitts and Nevis, at -1.03 million current US$ against -43.97 million current US$ in South Korea as of 2012.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states between South Korea and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
42.94 million current US$, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Korea and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
5 years are reported by both, from 1988 to 1999.
How do South Korea and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, united states?
South Korea ranks 164th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 163rd of 164 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Korea vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States. Statizoid, drawing on Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-states-current-us/korea-rep/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-united-states-current-us/korea-rep/st-kitts-and-nevis/">South Korea vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
211 places, 9,609 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors are the net disbursements of official development assistance (ODA) or official aid from the members of the Development Assistance Committee (DAC). Net disbursements are gross disbursements of grants and loans minus repayments of principal on earlier loans. ODA consists of loans made on concessional terms (with a grant element of at least 25 percent, calculated at a rate of discount of 10 percent) and grants made to promote economic development and welfare in countries and territories in the DAC list of ODA recipients. Official aid refers to aid flows from official donors to countries and territories in part II of the DAC list of recipients: more advanced countries of Central and Eastern Europe, the countries of the former Soviet Union, and certain advanced developing countries and territories. Official aid is provided under terms and conditions similar to those for ODA. Part II of the DAC List was abolished in 2005. The collection of data on official aid and other resource flows to Part II countries ended with 2004 data. DAC members are Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States, and European Union Institutions. Regional aggregates include data for economies not specified elsewhere. World and income group totals include aid not allocated by country or region. Data are in current U.S. dollars.